Transcript of the speech of the Minister of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation Maxim Topilin at a meeting of the Commission for Monitoring the achievement of targets for socio-economic development
<...> M. Topilin: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich! Dear Dmitry Anatolyevich!
Dear colleagues! Those tasks that are assigned to the Government in the decrees of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, occupy a key place in the work of the Ministry. I will focus on three areas of activity. A few words about the results that you said.
Demographic policy - in fact, it was really possible to achieve the indicator for the total birth rate. This indicator reflects the number of children born to one woman. And as you noted, Vladimir Vladimirovich, despite the fact that we may have a total number of births and women in reproductive age that will decrease, this very indicator - the total fertility rate - levels the changes in the population structure and takes into account the number of children per woman . We set ourselves the task by 2020 to achieve this indicator at the level of about 1.85 and thereby approach the most successful countries in Europe. Today, having reached 1.75, we have actually overtaken countries such as Austria, Germany, Italy and several other European countries, but there are still reserves.
At the same time, I would like to note that such new support tools for families with children as the allowance for the third and subsequent children, which we have already paid to 220 thousand families, have made a key contribution to achieving these indicators and contributing to the achievement of these indicators. A year ago, such a benefit was paid to less than 100 thousand families. We continue to co-finance regions, all regions in which the total birth rates are lower than the average for the Russian Federation. And not to be unfounded, in those regions that introduced such a benefit and to which we provide financial support, the number of third and subsequent children in two years has increased by 20 percent. And those regions in which such a benefit has not been established, the increase is less than 10 percent, and the total fertility rate in these regions is growing 2.5 times faster than in other regions. Therefore, it seems to us that two years of working with this manual have shown its effectiveness.
Work to increase wages in close connection with the achievement of quality indicators is also under special control. I will give a few numbers.
If before the start of the implementation of decrees, the ratio of salaries in education to the average salary in Russia was 67 percent, then in 2014 this was already 79 percent. In healthcare, the ratio increased from 78 to 87 percent. That is, a significant shift, a turning point in the trend, has occurred. We are in control of the situation. And the most key attention in previous years and in 2015 will be given to two categories, which are determined by decrees - these are school teachers and teachers of preschool institutions. If to take last year, then there were 23 lagging regions in preschool institutions, and three regions in schools. In 2014, almost all regions coped with the task, and in total we have two regions lagging behind in schools, and eight subjects of the Russian Federation in preschool institutions. But this is a very slight deviation. We are working with them. I am sure that this year this task will be completed.
We pay very serious attention to the problem of differentiation in wages. Decisions were made to introduce restrictions on wage differentiation between managers and average wages in institutions. Regions perform these tasks, and on average, the ratio between wages in social institutions and managers is almost no more than 1 to 4. We even started from 1 to 8, and in principle, much more reasonable ratios in the regions are established and respected. We continue to work in this direction. We have prepared a bill that will provide for the introduction of the same restrictions not only for managers, but also for deputy heads of institutions, chief accountants, and the declaration of income information for these individuals will be introduced.
With regard to structural changes, I would like to note that changes occur with the introduction of new technologies and the constant refinement of the functions of structural units, especially those that are of a service nature, the labor duties of employees change. We continue to work on the topic of professional standards, have translated this into a format for working with the professional community, with employers' associations. Work is also underway to comply with standards for the volume of services provided.
I must say that a number of regions, of course, allow violations of the ratios that are signed in agreements with the governors, but nevertheless, according to the standards that are established, according to the standards of training per teacher, most regions cope with this task.
The prestige of work in the social sectors is gradually increasing. In a number of regions, almost double the growth of graduates of higher educational institutions who come to schools is noted. Compared to 2012, in many regions this figure doubled. The number of teachers aged 23 to 35 years is growing - there is also a positive trend.
We conduct this work in constant contact with trade unions, with the All-Russian Popular Front, with the Accounts Chamber, so that, as you said, to identify and not allow, and if this occurs, then correct errors that are related precisely to ensuring quality and accessibility services.
This year it is planned to allocate 61 billion rubles from the federal budget and the budgets of the constituent entities of the Federation. This money is provided in the budgets. The salary level must be maintained. And at the same time, 30 percent, as stipulated by the decree, so far under those agreements that are signed with the regions, these are precisely internal resources, as you said, Vladimir Vladimirovich.
Very short by independent assessment. You said that the law came into force. Now these mechanisms are being introduced in the regions, regulatory acts are being adopted. Indeed, this is a completely new tool for assessing the performance of organizations when not officials participate in the assessment, namely public organizations and professional communities through surveys of the population. And the population will directly assess the performance of organizations. What are these indicators? For example, in health care this is the availability of an appointment with a doctor, this is the waiting time for planned hospitalization. Such surveys will be conducted, the population will evaluate the work precisely in terms of its perception. These results of an independent assessment must be taken into account by organizations when changing their plans of activity. This work is now being set up in the regions, we really hope for feedback.
And just a few words on jobs for the disabled. You said that this work is slow. Those indicators that are established by decrees, that is 14.2 thousand jobs per year, are fulfilled, even exceeded by 5 percent somewhere. Moreover, we pay most attention to those people with disabilities who have the most severe disability groups, groups I and II, these are specialized jobs. We set ourselves the task of expanding our coverage and paying quite serious attention to this topic. A new version of the Accessible Environment program for 2016–2020 is currently being prepared. And in the framework of this program, together with colleagues from other ministries and departments, together with public organizations, we pay serious attention to this topic. In the course of the budget process for 2016-2018, this program will be prepared, all activities will be reflected in it, I am sure, we will increase accessibility for the employment of disabled people and solve a number of other tasks.
Thanks. The report is completed.<...>
Three blocks on the agenda
issues: the provision of state and municipal services through the MFC network,
an independent assessment of the quality of services in the social sphere and the resettlement of citizens from emergency housing.
Shorthand
report on a joint meeting of the State Council and the Commission under the President
on monitoring the achievement of target indicators of socio-economic development
Vladimir Putin: Good afternoon,
Dear colleagues!
We are today with the participation of members of the Government, representatives
public associations will discuss how
the tasks that are indicated in the May decrees of the President of 2012 are being carried out.
initially
I’ll say right away that over the past years I managed to give
some new positive dynamics
changes in the most sensitive, significant for the life of citizens areas, such as healthcare,
education, culture, housing and communal services.
Of course, there are still many problems
and unresolved issues more than what
managed to do. However, the implementation of decrees
allowed to strengthen partnership at all levels
authorities and civil society in deciding
national tasks.
Work efficiency has increased dramatically thanks to public scrutiny,
who organized the All-Russian Popular Front.
It is necessary to further expand the dialogue with professional, volunteer, civil associations, NGOs, create
new opportunities for initiatives
our people.
I would also like to note the work of the leaders of the regions, their management teams. In the subjects of the Federation, where competently and responsibly
approached the matter, concentrated resources and efforts on solving the problems of citizens, despite all the difficulties, managed
get really serious, noticeable results.
I emphasize that successes should be
become the basis for moving forward. This is the only way to answer people's requests. Today they are already guided by the highest world standards, which means
what we have to solve increasingly complex
tasks. This applies to the social sphere and public administration, the creation of modern jobs and conditions for doing business, quality
housing, ecology and generally space for
of life.
That is why many provisions of the May decrees have already received a logical
development in priority projects of the Government
Russian Federation and other programs and plans. Now important in general
look at what has been done, designate
problem areas, formulate our further actions.
From this point of view, I propose to discuss
specific issues on today's agenda: this
development of an independent assessment system of the quality of work of social institutions, development of the emergency resettlement program
housing, as well as improving activities
multifunctional centers. I offer from them
and start.
Dear colleagues! A few years ago, citizens, in order to get a certificate, had to
almost everywhere, without exception,
stand in lines, upholster the thresholds of various offices, pay money to intermediaries. Indeed, there are still many problems of this kind, but still
the situation as a whole is starting to change.
Today, many people come to multifunctional
centers where you can issue a certificate of maternity capital, certificate of an individual entrepreneur, register property, get
other services. Such MFCs are open almost throughout the country.
With the activities of one of them (many probably drew
attention) I met recently in Veliky Novgorod.
Not only looked at their work there - and in other regions of Russia, but the last time was in Veliky Novgorod,
looked what was going on there.
In general, the country has three thousand MFCs, which
provide almost the entire range of public services. Last year, the number of hits
exceeded 60 million.
I emphasize
this project has become successful, but you can not stop on what has been done. Indeed, in some centers, queues are still preserved, oddly enough. Not everywhere
a full range of services is provided, and their
quality even at the MFC does not always meet
the demands that people make on them. I draw your attention, it is the opinion of people, their wishes that should become
basis for further improvement
work of multifunctional centers.
The principal task is to create
conditions for citizens to apply to any MFC,
regardless of place of residence and registration. This is an important step towards creating a holistic, integrated system.
provision of state and municipal
services.
Dear colleagues! Within
the implementation of the May decrees launched
independent assessment of the quality of work of organizations in the social sphere. I emphasize that we need an independent assessment,
certainly not for show. It's real
the opportunity for people to influence the process of changes in the work of those institutions that are most important in a specific, daily practical life: these are hospitals, clinics,
educational and cultural institutions.
Speech
It is about the citizens themselves to express
comments on the quality of service, including people
with limited opportunities for health, material and technical equipment of institutions and so on, evaluated
the friendliness of the staff, after all,
and then they could check how their proposals were taken into account, what decisions were made, what is being put into practice in practice.
Therefore, the results should not, of course, be filed in a folder, go under the cloth. Need to create
a clear mechanism for promoting social
institutions that respond to inquiries
citizens, and provide for harsh measures against those who are not ready, do not want to listen
people who do not want to work to increase their effectiveness.
And of course, it’s crucial for us
ensure true independence of assessment. Now
Unfortunately, there are also cases when budgetary organizations
arrange the so-called cabal:
Interview and evaluate themselves. And then it turns out that clinics, for example, have a formally high score,
but in fact, you can’t get to the experts, and indeed the level of service is quite low.
Necessary
eliminate conflict of interest during an independent evaluation. To do this, expand
participation in her
conducting the All-Russian Popular Front, socially oriented NGOs, public chambers in the regions. I ask civic activists to be regularly informed about how this work is going, whether objectivity is increasing, whether people are satisfied
the results of these evaluations and subsequent
decision making.
Dear colleagues! Another issue on our agenda, very serious,
large-scale, very important for our millions
citizens - this is the elimination of emergency housing
(barracks, all kinds of temporary houses), which
It was created as temporary huts, and then people live for decades in these, so to speak, rooms deprived of basic amenities. We are talking about millions of square meters. We set a very difficult goal - to provide a new one by September 2017.
comfortable housing for more than 700 thousand of our citizens. I will remind what
specifically it was a question and what are the numbers here.
From January 1, 2014 to September 2017, it is necessary to resettle 11.15 million square
meters, on which lives 711.6 thousand
human. As of April 1, 2017, 8.13 million square meters were settled (almost 73
percent of the planned indicator), on which 520 thousand people live, is 73 with a small percentage of the planned indicator. Such is
picture for today.
The vast majority of subjects
Federations, as the data show, perform
assigned tasks, in spite of any difficulties of today. I suggest thinking about measures to encourage them,
including financial. I also appeal to the governors, to the leaders of the regions that
obviously they don’t meet the deadlines, and for well-known reasons, which we have talked about more than once,
including due to obvious managerial mistakes. Please take personal responsibility,
Dear colleagues, for the situation, do not send
to explain to subordinates, and to come to the people themselves and clearly say when they can move to new housing.
At the same time I want to warn those
who in pursuit of deadlines trying
to impose on people houses where roofs flow,
the plaster is crumbling, that is, on the principle of "take, God, that we are not worth it," well, just to report. I want to repeat
important not only the timing, but also the quality of housing.
I also ask you to deal in detail with those cases when people are formal, often far-fetched
reasons were not included in the program
relocation.
And I want to repeat again, the scale
the problems of course are very large and in number
emergency homes that were not recognized
those at the beginning of 2012. Of course
I would like to do more and expand
this framework, but we need to fulfill at least what we have.
Nevertheless, I entrust the Government of the Russian
Federations, together with the regions, develop permanent emergency resettlement mechanisms
housing stock and launch them from January 1, 2019, and for the transition period I propose to extend the work
Housing and communal services fund,
which has generally proven effective.
Moreover, the draft law in the Government has been worked out and is ready to be adopted.
Let's move on
to the first item on the agenda. Word to the Minister
economic development to Maxim Stanislavovich Oreshkin.
M. Oreshkin Oreshkin Maksim StanislavovichMinister of Economic Development : Dear colleagues!
Almost
every citizen of our country has to receive official documents from time to time: passport, birth certificate, draw up
maternal capital. I think many will agree that over the past few years it has become
much simpler.
Of course,
not the least role was played by the creation of the network
multifunctional centers for the provision of public services "My documents." The first centers were opened yet
10 years ago, but now, which is very
importantly, the signboard “My Documents” can be seen literally everywhere: not only in large cities, but also in the most remote
settlements.
Today
in Russia there are about 13 thousand
branches, and they cover 96 percent of the population of our country. Last year alone, these centers were
93 million services provided. Centers
operate on the principle of "one window", that is, in one place people can
get access to 30 types of services
at the federal level and about one and a half hundred types of regional and municipal services.
What has generally changed with the advent of the MFC? Before
In total, the system of interaction between citizens and the state has changed. For centuries, despondent public places,
vividly described by Russian classics, finally
become comfortable, modern and technological, and their work is transparent,
regulated and predictable over time.
When creating the MFC in Russia was analyzed
international experience, mass retail solutions were considered
companies that have succeeded in creating a friendly environment for people. In addition to the service windows themselves, the centers have information
racks, comfortable waiting areas, children's
corners, internet access and more.
By creating a network of centers only in recent
For several years, the average waiting time in line for receiving public services was reduced by 2.5 times. In these half an hour
time that people began to save if
multiply them by 93 million services, then the total time savings for citizens
of our country is more than two million man-days. MFC Visitors
appreciated our efforts and level of satisfaction
the quality of services today has already exceeded 80 percent, and for comparison, in 2004 it was less than twenty.
Significant
number of MFCs equipped today
special terminals to evaluate the service received. For those
goals, there is SMS service. Last year alone, citizens rated at the MFC almost five
million services. The proportion of positive ratings exceeded 96 percent. Evaluation system in different regions
It works differently: somewhere is better, somewhere worse.
For example, at present, practically no data are received from the MFC of the Republic
Ingushetia, Tver and Ivanovo regions.
As you build your infrastructure and simplify all procedures
citizens' expectations are also rising. We understand that multifunctional centers must
develop further in accordance with these
expectations, and the process of providing public services should become easier and more convenient.
what
is it planned to do this? First we
we want the centers to work, not starting from the conveniences of departments and historical practice
public services, and primarily based on the needs of a particular person. The next step in increasing
the convenience of the MFC will be the transition to a model of work from a life situation, and not from a public service.
I will bring
an example of what this means in practice. When a child is born in a family, parents need to simultaneously receive up to 19 public services:
birth certificate, maternity capital, register a child in an apartment and so on. Each service needs its own application.
But we want to make sure that one
statement, and the rest of the work was undertaken by the state. First passport, wedding, change of surname, your
business or new home -
in these situations, it’s important for people to receive documents
as quickly as possible. We have prepared the necessary draft law, and I ask,
Vladimir Vladimirovich, support him.
Second:
many citizens, receiving a service at the MFC, often when payment is necessary, for example, state fees are faced with the problem of having to travel to the department
bank, or payment through devices with a large commission, which do not always work well. To
such problems did not arise, it is necessary to organize
payment through MFC staff. Such a bill has also been prepared.
Third:
we must move forward to further expand the list of services provided. Now we are with the Tax Service
working on the possibility of receiving tax returns
and the provision of other services. At the same time, we pay special attention to issues
maintaining tax secrecy. This, by the way,
It will not be the first experiment with the Tax Service.
So,
for example, the Moscow region has already launched a pilot project, under which
at any appeal of the MFC citizen
automatically checks for the tax debt of the applicant and issues a receipt for paying off the debt. it
allowed a significant increase in revenue and reduced tax arrears to the budget.
Second
the story here is the issuance of foreign passports and the replacement of driver’s
certificates. Together with the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, we need to ensure the provision of such services in all
multifunctional centers. Now, unfortunately, this is not so.
Fourth:
we have yet to complete the development of administrative regulations for the provision of services, to register in detail and in detail all the procedures
inside multifunctional centers, set the time
fulfillment, formalize failures and exclude unreasonable failures. It must be ensured where it has not yet been done,
electronic interaction of the IFC and government bodies.
It is important to build a system of motivation for MFC employees so that they are interested in the results of their work, do not wrap people if they do not like something in the documents, but really seek to help and try to understand each specific situation.
For
in order to improve exactly what cares
citizens, feedback is very important. We must rebuild the system in such a way as to keep track of all grades right up to
to the specific specialist who provided the service, provide
work with reviews, enter the results of the assessment in the motivation system of all
responsible persons.
there is
and other reserves to improve the efficiency of the MFC system. One of them is the transition to a centralized model of organization.
the activities of centers in the regions. We have
there are still 23 entities where the network consists of many municipal MFCs.
We believe that a centralized regional
the model is better managed, it allows to ensure uniform quality standards and optimize maintenance costs
apparatus.
In general, financing multifunctional centers is also difficult.
question. We have a number of proposals to provide additional
financing. We will look for a solution
together with the regions.
Completing
performance, I want to note that one important
the result of the creation in our country of a network of public service centers is the formation in the regions of teams that work
based on a customer-oriented approach using modern management technologies. They decide important for
people of the task and are now personnel
reserve for both regional and federal authorities.
Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!
One
of the main challenges of today -
it is the increasing speed of changes in the world: changes in technology, business models, management systems. The ability to change quickly
adapting to existing challenges, -
This is one of the key success factors. Therefore, I believe that the accumulated experience and culture
the work of the system of multifunctional centers is important to actively disseminate through the state system.
thanks
for your attention.
Vladimir Putin: Thanks a lot.
Golubev Vasily Yuryevich, Rostov Region.
V. Golubev
Golubev Vasily Yuryevichgovernor of the Rostov Region :
Respected
Vladimir Vladimirovich! Dear members of the State Council, invited!
Today
millions of Russian citizens judge the activities of the authorities as a whole in many respects from their experience in obtaining public services at the MFC. The main result of work over the years: people
believed in multifunctional centers. And you can maintain this trust only by constantly improving the quality of services.
System that measures quality
today, is actively working on
federal services, and Maxim Stanislavovich has already said this.
It, of course, needs to be developed - and how
minimum, in our opinion, in two
directions.
The first one. It is important to give citizens and businesses the opportunity to assess the quality of not only federal, but also regional and municipal services, they are the most popular. In many
regions, including the Rostov region,
more than 50 percent of the volume of services rendered -
these are services of regional and municipal
levels. For example, out of 246 types of services,
provided by the IFC network in the Don, only 20 percent are federal services. Thus,
today we do not have a systematic assessment for almost 80 percent of the services provided by municipalities and the region.
The second one. Quality assessment system
services should become even more personalized. At least should appear
the ability to analyze the causes of low ratings, their
the share today is not very large, but they are still
remain an indicator of the problem. It is important to know exactly the reasons for the dissatisfaction of the applicant. For example, if a significant proportion of poor grades
accounts for specific types of services you need
change the mechanism of interaction with authorities that provide services.
And if it comes
about the quality of service, you need to work with staff,
introduce client-oriented technologies for working with applicants by analogy with the best service practices
organizations.
Satisfaction
applicant - an indicator of the quality of service. But at the same time, the service itself should be clearly
set as a single throughout the country.
Therefore, in addition to developing a system for assessing the quality of services, we are faced with a task
implementation of uniform service standards
multifunctional centers. Necessary
describe as specifically as possible what the MFC employee should know, do in a specific situation and at each stage
interaction with the applicant.
We all understand that quality
only qualified personnel can provide the service
specialists. And today, each region organizes employee training independently, including creating training
units in the structure of centers. For example,
we took the path of introducing a system of continuous training for specialists at the IFC, however, unified federal educational
There are no standards in this area.
It cans
regional differences in levels of training and quality of service centers. It is advisable to combine
fragmented regional efforts into a single
training system. This is the third urgent task in addition to improving the system of assessment and implementation of service standards.
And the fourth.
High-quality service is impossible without staff motivation. Today, the MFC, as a rule, is able-bodied young
teams, but staff turnover is quite high. Having gained experience, many are moving to more
paid positions - both in the authorities and in the business structure. To
to retain specialists in the MFC system, it is necessary
First of all, a good level of salary plans.
Now the country has workers
centers - 70 percent of the average salary by region. There is a justification for this, because a significant share of the services provided is federal. They are growing
annually in quantity, in volume. To cover these costs budgets
regions since 2015 receive 50 percent
state fees paid by recipients of services
at the MFC. This is a good help for the regions, but additional measures are needed in this direction.
I will give an example. One of the most
Rosreestra's services that are in demand today - to provide information from the Unified State Register of Real Estate, this is 37.6 percent of the total set of types of services,
but for her
not a state duty is charged, but a fee whose division between federal and regional budgets, as opposed to a duty
not provided by law.
This question has been worked out in the process.
training with specialists from the Ministry of Economic Development, a number of regions, he, of course,
requires a solution. Therefore, I ask you to add it to the list of instructions following the results of the meeting of the State Council. He is in full
least will not solve the problem of salary, but will help
partially. Therefore, other solutions are possible,
which require attention.
Wherein
not only the additional assistance of the regions is important, but also its
targeted use specifically for development
multifunctional centers. And such an appointment must be fixed. This will create a real opportunity.
increase salaries in the MFC system by analogy with other
social spheres of education of health care, culture and so on.
Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!
Today, the MFC system in a concentrated form reflects the effectiveness of work
all institutions of power. That's why
necessary measures to do the job
centers not just high-quality, but probably still
exemplary. Thanks.
Vladimir Putin: Thank you
You. We will discuss them later, and colleagues will speak on this topic during the exchange of views, and now I propose
start an independent evaluation discussion
quality of work of organizations providing social services.
You are welcome,
Maxim Anatolyevich Topilin.
M. Topilin
Topilin Maxim AnatolevichMinister of Labor and Social Protection :
Respected
Vladimir Vladimirovich! Dear participants
meeting!
Since the beginning of 2013 in the Russian
The Federation began to form a completely new system for assessing the quality of service provision by organizations that
are at the first line of work with the population: these are organizations of education, health, culture, social services. it
a completely new form of public control,
so she conceived together with public organizations.
This
the form complements those forms of supervision, state supervision and control, various case studies, various
professional ratings, and from January 1, 2015, after the adoption of relevant laws, this
the system began to work in all regions of the Russian Federation.
As you said, the purpose of this system
is to enhance the impact
citizens on those decisions that are taken by executive bodies of entities, institutions from the point of
view, first of all, assessment of accessibility, information
about institutions, the disclosure of all possible services that these or other institutions provide social
spheres.
This is the comfort of providing services and an assessment by citizens
the set of services that is provided.
This is the waiting time for the service, the lack of queues. This is friendliness and competence, courtesy
staff. And, naturally, through such new
indicators, through an assessment by citizens of all services we
tried to build a new system.
For each industry together with public associations and public
organizations provided uniform indicators.
I will mention only a few of them: for example, in the field of culture, this is the convenience of graphics.
the work of organizations, the use of electronic
services; in education, this is a condition for individual work with students, the presence of additional
educational programs, opportunity
constant communication with parents, the ability of parents to ask necessary and interesting questions; in healthcare
this is the availability of electronic appointments (earlier generally
there were practically no such systems), this is the waiting period
service provision; in social services, this is convenience and people’s assessment of how fast and how comfortable services are provided
social workers at home what quality
the provision of services, including meals and leisure services in inpatient facilities, and much, much more.
The main thing is that this assessment itself leads to the formulation of tasks for all
institutions in front of the relevant executive authorities and was implemented in those plans that
developed by her
results.
Just yesterday led by
Dmitry Anatolyevich [Medvedev] we were in Smolensk,
and while visiting the orthopedic institution, the head doctor showed new touch terminals on which patients and visitors, relatives and friends can leave
this assessment for all indicators that are provided; it's all being processed
electronic.
Such
experience is also beginning to be introduced into the work of institutions. For two years, the volume
the coverage of institutions by an independent assessment was about 50 percent, a little lower, and we set the task this year to ensure that all institutions of social
areas were independently assessed
services.
What are the results now achieved? We see them,
certainly not enough, but at the same time I will name them. The first is that
associated with the improvement of the material and technical base, and, as a rule, these are the changes that do not require
very serious financial injections: this
land improvement, this is the acquisition of basic new equipment, this is the convenience of various services when
people come to see a doctor. That is, such events began
realized exactly by what
claims are made and questions are posed by citizens. It’s also the convenience of work schedules, convenience
the work of registries, appointments for receiving a particular service. And in connection with such questions posed by citizens,
executive bodies contribute
corresponding changes to the regulations of this work.
For institutions
culture in many regions, various services are being introduced in terms of online booking of tickets for receiving services in reading rooms - let's say, for
disabled according to their needs
appropriate equipment is purchased. That is, quite a lot of such
positive changes occur.
But at the same time, we note that
there are problems that are necessary
decide, including by making
changes in legislation. This is what
revealed during the first work during these one and a half to two years of public councils under the authorities
executive power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
We see that often in them
either employees of these organizations who are being evaluated, or employees of executive authorities take part
subjects of the Russian Federation. We have already begun
this work together with the Public Chamber in order to minimize these factors, but this will require, among other things, amendments to the legislation.
In addition, we see that the operators who organize the public assessment itself are not always properly selected, and these
operators are not always adequate enough
qualifications, because this is a fairly new job for them.
And here, as you already said, it is required to apply the experience of the same
nonprofit organizations that work
in this domain. Here, too, you need to establish this
work in the regions and, if necessary, amend legislation.
We see,
that often the subjects practically do not finance this work, but it requires certain
labor costs. Sometimes we see that the quality and quantity of respondents and made in this
Communication findings are minimal. That is, based on three or four questions are being made
certain conclusions. This is also necessary
avoided and appropriate too
requirements at the federal level and to operators,
and to those who participate in this work, to formulate.
To be continued.
THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
About the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation for monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, determined by the President of the Russian Federation
Expired on the basis of
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 19, 2018 N 444
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Document as amended:
(The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 08/09/2012);
By the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of September 10, 2012 N 1280 (Official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, September 11, 2012);
(The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 12/04/2012);
. (The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 07/11/2013);
(The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 10.30.2013);
(The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 12/30/2013);
(The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 04/23/2014);
(Official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 05/12/2014);
(The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 04/27/2015);
(The official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 09.16.2016, N 0001201609160024);
By the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of November 22, 2016 N 616 (Official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 11/22/2016, N 0001201611220051);
(Official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 01/16/2017, N 0001201701160040).
____________________________________________________________________
In order to ensure the solution of the problems of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation
i decide:
1. Form a Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to monitor the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, as determined by the President of the Russian Federation.
2. Approve the attached:
a) Regulation on the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation for monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, as determined by the President of the Russian Federation;
b) the composition of the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation for monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, as determined by the President of the Russian Federation.
3. This Decree shall enter into force on the day of its signing.
The president
Russian Federation
V. Putin
Regulation on the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation for monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, as determined by the President of the Russian Federation
1. The Commission under the President of the Russian Federation for monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation defined by the President of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) is an advisory and advisory body to the President of the Russian Federation formed to improve activities to ensure the achievement of social and social goals -economic development of the Russian Federation as determined by the President of the Russian Federation.
2. The Commission in its activities is guided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal laws, decrees and orders of the President of the Russian Federation, as well as these Regulations.
3. The Regulation on the Commission and its composition shall be approved by the President of the Russian Federation.
4. The main tasks of the Commission are:
a) consideration of issues related to the dynamics of the target indicators of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, defined by the President of the Russian Federation, as well as the methods and stages of their achievement;
b) preparation of proposals to the President of the Russian Federation on improving the state economic, social and demographic policy in order to ensure the achievement of target indicators of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation;
c) analysis of the practice of implementing in certain constituent entities of the Russian Federation, sectors of the economy, organizations of decisions to increase the remuneration of employees of the public sector and the transition to new mechanisms of remuneration taking into account the achievement of specific indicators of the quality and quantity of services provided;
d) assessment of the effectiveness of measures aimed at solving problems in the field of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, and preparation of proposals for their improvement.
5. The commission for the solution of the tasks assigned to it has the right:
a) request and receive in the prescribed manner the necessary information and materials from federal bodies of state power, bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, local authorities, other bodies, organizations, associations, as well as from officials;
b) invite to their meetings officials of federal bodies of state power, bodies of state power of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, local authorities, representatives of other bodies, organizations and associations;
c) involve in the established manner for the implementation of information-analytical and expert work, scientific and other organizations, as well as scientists and specialists.
6. The Commission shall be composed of the Chairman of the Commission, Deputy Chairmen of the Commission, Executive Secretary and members of the Commission.
The Chairman of the Commission is the President of the Russian Federation.
7. The Commission, in accordance with the tasks assigned to it, creates from among its members, as well as from representatives of bodies and organizations that are not members of the Commission, a working group of the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation to monitor the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, defined by the President of the Russian Federation to ensure the preparation of decisions of the Commission and the coordination of work in the Commission's areas of activity.
The head of the Commission’s working group and its composition are approved by the President of the Russian Federation.
8. Meetings of the Commission shall be held at least once every six months. If necessary, extraordinary meetings of the Commission may be held.
The preparation and organization of meetings of the Commission, as well as the resolution of current issues of the Commission's activities, are carried out by the Secretary of the Commission.
The meeting of the Commission is chaired by the chairman of the Commission or, on his behalf, one of the deputy chairmen of the Commission.
9. Decisions of the Commission are drawn up in a protocol signed by the chairperson of the meeting of the Commission.
To implement the decisions of the Commission, decrees and orders may be issued, orders and instructions of the President of the Russian Federation may be given.
10. The activities of the Commission are provided by the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation.
The composition of the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation for monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, as determined by the President of the Russian Federation
Putin V.V. | President of the Russian Federation (Chairman of the Commission) |
|
Nabiullina E.S. | Excluded from the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 11, 2013 N 622. |
|
Surkov V.Yu. | Excluded from the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 11, 2013 N 622. |
|
Simonenko V.A. | head of the Expert Department of the President of the Russian Federation (Executive Secretary of the Commission) |
|
By the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2013 N 813) |
||
Yudaev K.V. | Excluded from the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2013 N 813 |
|
Abyzov M.A. | Minister of the Russian Federation |
|
Babich M.V. | plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Volga Federal District |
|
Beglov A.D. | plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Central Federal District |
|
Belaventsev O.E. | plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the North Caucasus Federal District |
|
(By Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 23, 2014 N 273 by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of September 16, 2016 N 475) |
||
Belousov A.R. | assistant to the President of the Russian Federation (Deputy Chairman of the Commission) |
|
Brechalov A.V. | secretary of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, Co-Chair of the Central Headquarters of the All-Russian Public Movement "All-Russian Popular Front" (as agreed) |
|
(It is additionally included in the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 9, 2014 N 317; a post as amended by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 27, 2015 N 211) |
||
Bulavin V.I. | Additionally included in the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2013 N 813, is excluded - |
|
Vasilyeva O.Yu | Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation |
|
Volodin V.V. | Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation (as agreed) |
|
Vinnichenko N.A. | ||
Vorobyov A.Yu. | Governor of the Moscow Region (as agreed) |
|
(Additionally included in the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 1, 2012 N 1602; position as amended by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2013 N 813) |
||
Voronova T.G. | Additionally included in the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 27, 2015 N 211; excluded by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of January 16, 2017 N 11 |
|
Galushka A.S. | Minister of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East |
|
(Additionally included in the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2013 N 813) |
||
Govorun O.M. | Excluded from the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 1, 2012 N 1602 |
|
Golikova T.A. | Chairman of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation |
|
(The post as amended by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2013 N 813) |
||
Golodets O.Yu. | Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation |
|
Zhvachkin S.A. | Governor of the Tomsk Region (as agreed) |
|
Ilyukhin V.I. | governor of Kamchatka Territory (as agreed) |
|
Ishaev V.I. | ||
Manturov D.V. | Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation |
|
Matvienko V.I. | Chairman of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation (as agreed) |
|
Medinsky V.R. | Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation |
|
Melikov S.A. | Additionally included in the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 27, 2015 N 211, excluded - Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of September 16, 2016 N 475 |
|
Minister of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation |
||
(Additionally included in the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 28, 2013 N 962) |
||
Menyailo S.I. | plenipotentiary Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the Siberian Federal District |
|
Minnikhanov R.N. | President of the Republic of Tatarstan (as agreed) |
|
Morozov O.V. | Excluded from the composition of the Commission by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 27, 2015 N 211 |
|
Naryshkin S.E. |
Edition of the document taking into account
changes and additions prepared
JSC "Codex"
GOVERNMENT OF THE MOSCOW REGION
RESOLUTION
About the Interdepartmental Commission for Monitoring the Achievement of Targets for the Socio-Economic Development of the Moscow Region
Document as amended:
(The official website of the Government of the Moscow Region www.mosreg.ru, 02/13/2014);
(The official website of the Moscow Region Government is www.mosreg.ru, 07/19/2017).
____________________________________________________________________
In order to achieve the indicators of socio-economic development of the Moscow region, established,,,,,,,,, and in accordance with the List of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation following the meeting of the State Council of the Russian Federation on July 17, 2012, the Government of the Moscow Region
(The preamble as amended by the Decree of the Government of the Moscow Region of February 13, 2014 N 67/2.
decides:
1. Establish an Interdepartmental Commission for monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Moscow Region.
2. Approve the attached:
Regulation on the Interagency Commission for Monitoring the Achievement of Targets for the Socio-Economic Development of the Moscow Region;
the composition of the Interdepartmental Commission for Monitoring the Achievement of Targets for the Socio-Economic Development of the Moscow Region.
Vice Governor -
Prime Minister
Moscow region
A.V. Sharov
Composition of the Interdepartmental Commission for Monitoring the Achievement of Targets for the Socio-Economic Development of the Moscow Region
APPROVED
decree
Government
Moscow region
Balloons | Vice Governor - Chairman of the Government of the Moscow Region, Chairman of the Commission |
|
Antonova | minister of Education of the Moscow Region |
|
Belozerova | deputy Minister of Public Administration, Information Technology and Communications of the Moscow Region |
|
Vityaglovsky | first Deputy Head of the Main Directorate of the Moscow Region for Cooperation with Federal Government Agencies |
|
Vorontsov | minister of Ecology and Nature Management of the Moscow Region |
|
Hertsev | deputy Minister of Health of the Moscow Region - Head of the Department of Organization of Medical Assistance to Adults in the Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region |
|
Gorushkina | deputy Minister of Culture of the Government of the Moscow Region |
|
Zagidullin | chief Federal Inspector in the Moscow Region (as agreed) |
|
Krikunova | minister of Finance of the Moscow Region |
|
Levchenkov | minister of Investment and Innovation, Moscow Region |
|
Litvinova | first Deputy Minister of Consumer Market and Services of the Moscow Region |
|
Malin | deputy Minister of Physical Culture, Sports, Tourism and Youth Affairs of the Moscow Region |
|
Medvedev | minister of Economics of the Moscow Region, Secretary of the Commission |
|
Nikolaev | deputy Minister of the construction complex and housing and communal services of the Moscow region |
|
Satdarov | federal Inspector in the Moscow Region (as agreed) |
|
Serazetdinov | deputy Head of the Main Department of Internal Policy and Cooperation with Local Government Bodies of the Moscow Region |
|
Fast | minister of Agriculture and Food of the Moscow Region |
|
Slutsky | deputy Head of the Main Directorate of Regional Security of the Moscow Region |
|
Smirnova | deputy Minister of Transport of the Moscow Region |
|
Shooters | first Deputy Chairman of the Committee on Labor and Employment of the Population of the Moscow Region |
|
Timofeev | advisor to the Minister of Energy of the Moscow Region |
|
Khabrov | first Deputy Minister of Social Protection of the Moscow Region |
|
Chechkina | first Deputy Head of the Department of State and Municipal Service of the Moscow Region |
|
Chuprakov | minister of Property Relations of the Moscow Region |
Regulation on the Interdepartmental Commission for Monitoring the Achievement of Targets for Socio-Economic Development of the Moscow Region
APPROVED
decree
Government
Moscow region
dated October 2, 2012 N 1291/37
1. General Provisions
1.1. These Regulations determine the tasks, powers, the procedure for the formation and support of the activities of the Interdepartmental Commission for monitoring the achievement of the target indicators of socio-economic development of the Moscow Region (hereinafter referred to as the Interdepartmental Commission) established by Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation dated 07.05.2012 No. 596 "On Long-Term State Economic Policy" , dated 07.05.2012 N 597 "On measures for the implementation of state social policy", dated 07.05.2012 N 598 "On the improvement of state policy in the field of health Health Protection ", dated 07.05.2012 N 599" On measures to implement the state policy in the field of education and science ", dated 07.05.2012 N 600" On measures to provide citizens of the Russian Federation with affordable and comfortable housing and to improve the quality of housing and communal services ", dated 07.05.2012 N 601 "On the main directions of improving the public administration system", dated 07.05.2012 N 606 "On measures for the implementation of the demographic policy of the Russian Federation", dated 01.06.2012 N 761 "On the National Strategy of Actions for Children for 2012- 2017 years, "dated 12.28.2012 N 1688" On some measures on the implementation of state policy in the field of protecting orphans and children left without parental care "(hereinafter - the Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation).
Decree of the Government of the Moscow Region of February 13, 2014 N 67/2.
1.2. The Interdepartmental Commission in its activities is guided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal constitutional laws, federal laws, decrees and orders of the President of the Russian Federation, decrees and orders of the Government of the Russian Federation, the Charter of the Moscow region, laws and other regulatory legal acts of the Moscow region, decrees and orders of the Governor of the Moscow region , as well as these Regulations.
2. The main tasks of the Interdepartmental Commission
The main tasks of the Interdepartmental Commission are:
2.1. Ensuring timely and high-quality study of issues related to the dynamics of the target indicators of socio-economic development of the Moscow Region, established by Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, as well as the ways and steps to achieve these targets.
2.2. Ensuring control over the implementation of orders in the Moscow Region established by Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
2.3. Preparation of information materials to the Governor of the Moscow Region on the progress of monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Moscow Region and the execution of orders established by Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
2.4. Analysis of the level of wages in the sectors of the economy of the Moscow Region, consideration of decisions to increase the remuneration of public sector employees and the transition to new mechanisms of remuneration, taking into account the achievement of specific indicators of the quality and quantity of services provided.
3. Rights of the Interdepartmental Commission
The interagency commission has the right:
3.1. Request the necessary materials on the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Moscow region and the execution of orders established by Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, from the central executive bodies of state power of the Moscow region and local authorities of municipalities of the Moscow region.
3.2. To invite representatives of the central executive bodies of state power of the Moscow region and local authorities of the Moscow region to meetings.
3.3. To involve, in the established manner, the work of the Interdepartmental Commission of officials of the central executive bodies of state power of the Moscow Region and local authorities of municipalities of the Moscow Region.
3.4. Create from among its members, as well as from representatives of the central executive bodies of state power of the Moscow region and organizations not included in the Commission, working groups to ensure the preparation of decisions of the Interdepartmental Commission and coordinate work in the areas of activity of the Interdepartmental Commission, to monitor the implementation of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation Federation and achievement of targets in accordance with the Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
3.5. To prepare proposals on the development of draft regulatory legal acts of the Government of the Moscow Region on issues within the competence of the Interdepartmental Commission.
4. The order of work of the Interdepartmental Commission
4.1. The management of the work of the Interdepartmental Commission and the conduct of meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission is carried out by the Chairman of the Interdepartmental Commission - Vice-Governor of the Moscow Region.
(Clause as amended by the Decree of the Government of the Moscow Region of February 13, 2014 N 67/2.
4.2. Chairman of the Interdepartmental Commission:
presides over meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission;
signs decisions adopted by the Interdepartmental Commission;
determines the dates of meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission.
4.3. Secretary of the Interdepartmental Commission:
controls the timely submission of materials and documents for consideration at meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission;
draws up minutes of meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission;
exercises control over the implementation of decisions of the Interdepartmental Commission;
fulfills the instructions of the chairman of the Interdepartmental Commission.
4.4. Members of the Interdepartmental Commission may make proposals on draft agendas for its meetings, in order of consideration and the substance of issues discussed at meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission, and may speak at meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission.
4.4.1. Meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission are held at least once a quarter.
(Clause 4.4.1 is additionally included by the Decree of the Government of the Moscow Region of February 13, 2014 N 67/2)
4.5. Delegation by members of the Interdepartmental Commission of their powers to other persons is not allowed.
4.6. If it is impossible for a member of the Interdepartmental Commission to be present at the meeting, he must inform the Secretary of the Interdepartmental Commission in advance.
4.7. The meeting of the Interdepartmental Commission and in its work may be attended by the heads of the central executive bodies of state power of the Moscow Region within their competence on issues included in the agenda of the meeting of the Interdepartmental Commission.
4.8. Organizational and technical support for the work of the Interdepartmental Commission, maintaining the necessary documentation, drawing up minutes of meetings of the Interdepartmental Commission is carried out by the Ministry of Economy and Finance of the Moscow Region.
Resolution of the Government of the Moscow Region of June 27, 2017 N 530/22. - See previous edition)
4.9. The preparation of information and materials is carried out by the executive body of state power of the Moscow region, within its competence, together with the Ministry of Economics and Finance of the Moscow region on issues included in the agenda of the meeting of the Interdepartmental Commission.
(The paragraph as amended, entered into force on July 20, 2017 by the Decree of the Government of the Moscow Region of June 27, 2017 N 530/22. - See the previous edition)
4.10. A meeting of the Interdepartmental Commission is considered competent if at least half of its composition is present.
4.11. Decisions of the Interdepartmental Commission are adopted by open vote by a majority of the votes of its members present at the meeting. In case of a tie vote, the vote of the chairman of the Interdepartmental Commission is decisive.
4.12. Decisions of the Interdepartmental Commission are drawn up in a protocol that is approved by the chairman of the Interdepartmental Commission.
4.13. Decisions of the Interdepartmental Commission are reported to the Governor of the Moscow Region.
Edition of the document taking into account
changes and additions prepared
JSC "Codex"
The consistent implementation of such measures, large-scale, comprehensive measures, can lead to the release of employment, which is a certain challenge for all government agencies. One must be prepared for this. Now the unemployment rate is low - 5.5 percent of the employed population, but there may be a tendency to a slight increase. It is necessary to create a flexible system of advanced training and retraining of employees, including making business more interested in accepting this new workforce, and ensuring greater mobility of labor personnel - both industrial mobility and territorial mobility.
For this, we need a system of encouraging investments, especially of small and medium enterprises, which creates a large number of new jobs. This is of particular importance in high-risk regions, primarily in single-industry towns. It is important here to fully implement the plans to create a federal fund for guaranteeing investments of small and medium-sized enterprises (normative work has been completed, and the budget has allocated the appropriate funds for 2014-2015), as well as to ensure the allocation of funds to support projects in single-industry towns to create new jobs .
Last year, we launched a support mechanism through targeted subsidies to the subjects of the Federation under the programs for the development of innovative territorial clusters and industrial parks, you noted this in your opening remarks. Unfortunately, I must say that so far this program has not received development due to, probably, well-known acute budgetary problems: we could not ensure the allocation of the necessary funds in the 2014-2016 budget for the development of this program. I believe that we will still have to return to this issue in the next budget cycle and ensure the allocation of appropriate funds.
State programs for the development of industry as a whole and of the leading technological sectors provide for measures and targets for increasing labor productivity. However, it is necessary to clarify them taking into account existing budgetary constraints, the optimization potential that exists, and the effect of creating high-performance jobs.
It is necessary to adjust the existing mechanism of sectoral subsidies in such a way that their provision is determined by an increase in productivity and quality of labor. Such work is already underway, the Ministry of Industry has already carried out the adjustment of subsidies. It is necessary to extend it to programs for the development of the transport complex and programs for the development of agriculture, supplemented with the necessary targets for increasing labor productivity. It is also necessary to adjust the regional aspect, taking into account the elaboration of methodological recommendations at the federal level, and regional programs aimed at increasing labor productivity and creating highly productive jobs.
At the federal level, it is necessary to support the development of financial mechanisms to support regional projects, including the provision of a tax credit, reimbursement of a part of regional expenses aimed at increasing labor productivity and introducing modern technologies.
In this regard, the position to develop a new model for the construction of infrastructural facilities in the territories, taking into account settlements with investors through the accounting of funds that will be received after commissioning facilities in the public sector through taxation, was taken by us into operational development, and we are ready in the near future submit draft relevant regulatory legal acts.
Particular attention should be focused on industries that provide energy and transport infrastructure. The plan adopted by the Government for increasing the efficiency of infrastructure companies, primarily natural monopolies, for 2015-2016, which implies a serious reduction in costs and increasing labor productivity, should be supplemented by medium and long-term development programs of these companies, which include measures to increase labor productivity, update technologies, investment plans and optimization of operating and capital costs.
The issue of labor productivity is ultimately resolved at the micro level - at the enterprise level. Incentives need to be worked out to optimize companies, especially companies with state participation, production capabilities, the introduction of modern forms and methods of organizing production and an innovative culture.
We have very good examples. The so-called production programs of Sberbank and Rosatom are, I believe, one of the best in world practice. We need to achieve the replication of such approaches and their distribution in other companies with state participation, and in private business. The dissemination of best practices will be facilitated by both competition and support for the development of the consulting services market for engineering companies.
Government programs should be linked not only with federal and local budgets, but also with innovative development strategies at the corporate level. It is important not only the coordination of events and targets, but also the linking of the remuneration system of company management, especially companies with state participation, with the achievement of targets for the creation and modernization of high-performance jobs. The weight of innovative parameters in the management remuneration system, the coefficient of assessment of their participation should be significantly increased.
To increase labor productivity throughout the Russian economy by one and a half times until 2018 is an extremely difficult task. Meanwhile, in a number of leading sectors and companies, we have the potential to not only achieve such positions, but even significantly exceed them. In order to ensure practical coordination of the work and approval of the best, most advanced corporate practices, a subcommittee of the government commission for the sustainable development of economic integration has been created, headed by Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich. We believe that coordination of work at all levels of the executive branch, monitoring and adjustment of relevant industry and regional programs, and public control over this work will provide the necessary conditions for achieving the goals of socio-economic development.
Thanks.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Alexey Valentinovich, there is a question. Now you mentioned this in passing - in fact, the decision you made to freeze the tariffs of infrastructure monopolies for the next year and then index them in subsequent years by inflation. Good decision, talked a lot about it. Now I hear about proposals for the Russian Railways to make an exception: raise the tariff for the oil industry. Do you understand what it is? In this way, you can shift the entire burden of the entire economy to the “oil industry”. The first one.
The second - as soon as RZD’s tariff increases for the "oil industry" - it works like a stove, as the oil workers themselves say - immediately, and other components of their production costs will increase in very many ways.
How can you comment on this?
A. ULYUKAEV: Vladimir Vladimirovich, the first. We never proposed such a measure as raising the tariff for the oil industry, but there were such proposals. And during the discussion, our position was as follows: the company "Russian Railways" with the current regulatory framework has the right to adjust tariffs both downward and upward for certain directions, certain categories of cargo.
Our position is as follows: if the company chooses to increase the tariff for this category of goods, it will be obliged to simultaneously take measures to reduce tariffs for other categories of goods in order to ensure a zero tariff decision. On the whole, this was never our proposal - to make some kind of exception for the oil industry.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Yes, but we understand where this may lead. Are we going to keep the rest of the economy at the expense of the oil industry? We’ll overload everything in one industry, so it turns out?
A. ULYUKAEV: We do not propose overloading on one industry, but I must say for reference that this industry is the industry that benefits most from our tariff freeze. She is the main beneficiary.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: That's right, we all know that.
A.DVORKOVICH: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, indeed, now Russian Railways has proposed raising tariffs for oil cargo during transportation by rail. This proposal is being discussed, it has been submitted for formal discussion, but such a decision has not yet been made. This is the first.
The second one. When we considered the tax maneuver, I’ll just remind you: we reduce export duties on petroleum products and at the same time increase excise taxes on petroleum products - we believed that the tariffs on Russian Railways would be frozen, and Transneft’s tariffs would be indexed, and all calculations were made based on of this. It turned out that in general the oil industry in 2014 will win a little - it will not lose, but it will win. Then it was decided to freeze Transneft’s tariffs, respectively, and the oil industry won even more, and therefore Russian Railways had a reasonable idea from their point of view - to index tariffs for the “oil industry” somewhat.
I want to emphasize that the balance of the oil industry as a whole wins anyway, nevertheless this decision has not been made, it will be discussed. In any case, it is important what the dynamics will be for three years ahead, and not just for one year. As part of this three-year balance, we will discuss how best to do this so that no one loses.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: My friends, dear colleagues! Today is the last days of the outgoing year. All companies consider their economy, plan their future for the coming year, at least for subsequent years. What I urge you to do is to consider such things in a timely manner. “We, as you said, first thought like that, then we thought so, then we decided to freeze [tariffs] for Transneft all the same.”
It must be considered in advance. The very next year, in 2015, we must consider now that there are no such signals for the market. They are negative, affect the economy, and disrupt the most important sector of our economy from the working rhythm.
To make it clear, this is not Rosneft complaining - no need to roll, it has nothing to do with it. These are all oil companies, I recently met with them, almost everything. They, of course, stood still. This must not be allowed. It is necessary that it be transparent, understandable and timely, balanced. So I'm calling for what. You need to work more professionally.
A. ULYUKAEV: Vladimir Vladimirovich, if possible?
Now the right to raise tariffs in certain areas, categories of goods assigned to the company "Russian Railways". There is a proposal to return to the system when the Federal Tariff Service directly has such opportunities - and to remove it from the rights of companies. Maybe this will also need to be discussed now and an appropriate decision made.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: You know, there are government representatives in this company. There is no need to get cancer over a stone. All this can be regulated, but only it is necessary to do it in a timely manner and it is necessary to calculate it to the end, all the consequences for the Russian Railways company itself, which is one of the most important components of our entire economy, its investment package, must be considered for other sectors of the economy. You just have to do it in time and calculate everything.
Artamonov Anatoly Dmitrievich, please.
A.ARTAMONOV: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich! Dear members of the Council of State! The participants of the meeting!
The labor productivity indicator is a mirror of the development not only of the economy, but of society as a whole. Without diminishing the importance of increasing labor productivity in the social sectors, our working group nevertheless considered that the most important solution to this problem was in the basic sectors of the economy.
This conclusion is also confirmed by data from various studies, including the Eurasian Institute of Competitiveness, according to which, 40 percent of our lag in terms of labor productivity falls on mechanical engineering and another 40 percent comes from other industries and agriculture.
According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the current level of labor productivity in our country is estimated at no more than 39 percent of the United States. To reduce this gap, we have to almost double the growth of labor productivity, bringing it up to 5-6 percent per year. But we, by the way, already had such growth rates in previous years. Of course, it is now possible to arrange a competition between regions and sectors of the economy for achieving the highest indicators of labor productivity. But in the opinion of the members of our working group, this will not do much, except that it will load a large number of talented people with interesting analytical work. It is much more important to harvest in the form of a real increase in labor productivity from the efforts that we will take to modernize the economy and create new highly efficient industries.
One of the most important growth factors is, of course, a reduction in the state’s share in the economy. At the same time, we need at the legislative level to increase the responsibility of business participants for fulfilling the obligations that they assume under the terms of contracts, especially when it concerns such sensitive areas as housing and communal services, for example. Increasing the transparency of the activities of state corporations and natural monopolies could also give a significant increase in raising labor productivity not only for themselves, but also in the country as a whole.
The second important motivation for the modernization of existing industries is the creation of conditions under which it would be profitable for them to reinvest their profits for the purpose of modernization, and not direct them to eating, to pay bonuses and dividends. However, this reserve, of course, is not enough. In world practice, there are no such examples that a radical restructuring of the economy, especially manufacturing, was carried out without borrowing funds. However, business calculations show that in order to repay loans to banks under current conditions, one must have a profitability of at least 30 percent. In manufacturing, for example, this is basically impossible. And plus the super-difficult conditions for obtaining loans precisely for enterprises in manufacturing sectors of the economy.
An important reserve for the modernization of industry, and hence the increase in labor productivity, may be additional measures to support export-oriented non-primary industries, since the fact of conquering foreign markets alone is proof of the high qualities and innovativeness of these products and the efforts made by its manufacturers to modernize their products. productions. And this, of course, should be encouraged, including by the state.
Newly created industries are always based on the creation of highly productive jobs, which means that we should pay even more attention to increasing the investment attractiveness of both individual regions and the country as a whole. To date, we have already accumulated sufficient experience in attracting investment in our country. The successes of Tatarstan, Belgorod, Ulyanovsk and other areas in the development of the economy are known to all, we are willing to study the experience of our colleagues and adopt it. There are certain achievements in the Kaluga region, we are also willing to share them.
A lot is being done in the country today to remove administrative barriers, eliminate corruption, and provide tax preferences. Many laws and regulations have been adopted that are aimed at increasing the investment attractiveness of Russia. ASI, the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, Delovaya Rossiya, OPORA Rossii, and, of course, created development institutions, primarily Vnesheconombank, contributed to this. However, it must be admitted that in the case of the modernization of existing industries for the same reasons, attracting borrowed funds to implement investment projects in our country also remains problematic.
In addition, we have a very poorly developed project finance institution. No matter how hard it is to realize it, we have no choice but to bring our monetary policy in line with the requirements of an economy aimed at development. Our working group proposes to include the issue of increasing the availability of loans, especially for manufacturing, in the list of instructions following a meeting of the State Council.
The government should send business signals of its interest in attracting investment - and above all through joint responsibility. Investing in infrastructure is precisely a manifestation of such mutual interest.
However, we must admit that we are still very few in comparison with existing needs are building modern high-speed roads. In rail transport, labor productivity also remains very low, and tariffs are sometimes too high for many participants in economic activity.
And, which is especially sad, we practically lost the river fleet, which no mode of transport could compete with in terms of productivity and economy. And for this reason, by the way, we significantly increased the load on our roads, which were not designed to promote such heavy vehicles that transport bulk building materials, for example.
The third important reserve for increasing our investment attractiveness is still a tariff policy, and the decisions that you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, made by the country's leadership to curb the growth of tariffs of natural monopolies will undoubtedly have a beneficial effect on economic development.
What is especially important is the continuation of state policy aimed at the development of small and medium-sized businesses. But in this direction, of course, there are successes now, they are also seen by the small business itself, but we still need to shift the focus of this work in the development of small and medium-sized businesses to the real sector of the economy and reinforce it with additional preferences.
The development of a new economy inevitably entails the task of training personnel of a new formation, studying the best practices of organizing lean production and developing leadership qualities of managers. We have to admit that the current system of vocational education does not yet meet the requirements of the new economy.
For example, we had to urgently invest more than a billion rubles in the creation of a special center that trains personnel for the automotive industry, and over the past four years, more than 9,000 such specialists have already been trained. Now, according to the same scheme, personnel training for the pharmaceutical cluster has begun. In the branch of the Bauman Technical University, a combined, or, as they say now, dual, education system was introduced.
It would be important, dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, if you instructed to develop a special program, according to which not only the Ministry of Education of Russia, but also line ministries, within the framework of, perhaps, your programs, R&D, would take part in solving the most important task of personnel training for a new economy on an equal footing with the regions.
Today, Russia is still an extremely under-industrialized country in terms of consumer goods production. Hence the prevailing import in the consumer market. And the more we create new modern industries, the more we will need workers. This is the issue of unemployment, which supposedly threatens us in connection with the modernization of production. I absolutely disagree with this.
An exception may, to some extent, be temporary monotowns. And in addition to them, there are also cities that become unemployed due to the deliberate bankruptcy of previously successful enterprises by new negligent owners. By the way, the issue of responsibility in these cases not only of hired managers, but also of the owners of the enterprises of this business has long ripened.
Today, the need has ripened for the actual resettlement of the released working-age population, for example, through the construction of housing for military personnel being laid off. Today it is being built to a greater extent in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other large centers. Or providing support to those who move to a new place of residence in case this region really needs additional labor resources. A very good help in this is the development of the rental housing market. Certain experience in this direction is available in the Kaluga region.
In conclusion, I would like to say about another significant, in my opinion, reserve, which, if fully utilized, could perhaps help to the greatest degree to solve the problem of rapid economic growth and labor productivity. It is necessary to make all regions, each municipality, interested in this process. Why hide it, while this is far from always the case.
In your Address to the Federal Assembly, you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, announced a very important decision that will allow the regions to compensate for the confirmed costs of creating the infrastructure of industrial parks. This will certainly give a powerful multiplier effect in attracting investment. But in order to even more actively involve the initiative of the regions, in our opinion, it would be right to consider introducing at least a temporary moratorium on the application of the rules that the Ministry of Finance is guided today in determining the amount of financial assistance to regions and co-financing joint projects and programs.
Today it is carried out depending on budgetary security, which significantly reduces the desire of the regions to increase this very security and generates dependent moods. Perhaps, in the instructions following the results of today's meeting of the State Council, this problem could also be resolved. This will certainly cause additional interest among the regions in the development of the economy and increase in labor productivity, which, in fact, is required.
Thanks for attention.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: This is a good offer. Only then will the total amount of funds that the Ministry of Finance can use to equalize budgetary provision be reduced, and frankly speaking, poor regions will be even poorer. Do we understand this or not?
A.ARTAMONOV: Vladimir Vladimirovich, there are schemes that poor regions will not suffer.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Tell me, right now, name these schemes. I don’t know anything about them yet, but if you open my eyes, I will be very grateful to you.
A.ARTAMONOV: For example, I agree, maybe God bless him, with this transfer, which in this case means, let it go to those regions that have not yet reached a sufficient level of their development. For example, the same dilapidated and emergency housing program.
Today, we need 72 percent to co-finance from our budget, although if we take five years ago, we had 30 percent co-financing. Thus, there are practically no reserves for repayment of the loans that we took for development.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Yes, it is more difficult, but for some subjects of the Federation, which do not have such budgetary security as yours, they will not have this easy. They will not be able to do what is happening with you. Moreover, keep in mind there are regions remote from the centers of economic activity. Kaluga is located near Moscow, conveniently however, there are certain competitive advantages. Our territory is large, but a little further - everything, there will be a different situation.
Let us now ask the Minister of Finance to comment. Please, Anton Germanovich.
A. SILUANOV: What is Anatoly Dmitrievich talking about? He says the following: that there are subsidies today that are provided to the regions to fulfill their powers. And the region’s participation in these subsidies varies depending on the region’s budget capabilities.
Strong regions - more share, weak regions - less share. In principle, this is a fair approach. And strong regions, of course, can participate more in co-sponsored events. But in the current conditions, when all the forces of the regions are concentrated on the implementation of Presidential decrees, which must also be fully ensured, I certainly believe that, in general, the requirements for co-financed obligations of the region can be lowered as a whole.
If we suppose a year ago we could demand participation in the region as a whole 50 to 50, then now we could make 30 to 70: 30 - region, 70 - Federation, provided that this should concern priority co-financed events, because there are subsidies that are not related to the implementation of Presidential decrees. For these events, for investments, maybe even some activities we can postpone in this way for a longer period, there is nothing wrong with that if it is not a specified event.
Therefore, in general, I believe that the requirement for regions to co-finance should be lowered for priority co-financed activities.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: And what do we agree on at the meeting related to the implementation of plans for the resettlement of emergency housing, remember?
A. SILUANOV: Yes.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Where did we talk about the need to still increase federal participation. What decisions are finally made?
A. SILUANOV: Vladimir Vladimirovich, in accordance with your instructions, the requirement for the participation of the regions has been reduced. It was 70 to 30: 70 - the region, 30 - the Federation. Now it is 50 to 50, in some regions - 60 to 40. Requirements for the regions are reduced. This is on the one hand.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Thank you very much.
And the proposal of Anatoly Dmitrievich, have we also discussed this many times at various sites, regarding the availability of loans?
A. SILUANOV: We can only talk about, of course, subsidizing interest rates on loans. Naturally, we cannot administratively impose certain rates on commercial banks. Subsidizing interest rates is already the budget decisions of the region, possibly with the participation of the Federation.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: No, not only subsidies, there are other instruments, for example, state guarantees.
Why is he talking about this? He has many new factories, many enterprises, he worked on the development of infrastructure and borrowed very seriously, as far as I can see from the documents, right?
A.ARTAMONOV: We are reducing this credit debt, Vladimir Vladimirovich. We have already reduced it by half, nevertheless, in a certain period of time, it exceeded 80 percent. Now there are 50 left.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Therefore, the governor is so worried and speaks of this accessibility.
You are welcome.
A. SILUANOV: We have provided, Vladimir Vladimirovich, in the budget for support measures in the form of state guarantees. In this case, the list of objects is selected, respectively, created by the Commission within the framework of the Government.
If the objects that fall within the framework of these priority objects from the regions — these are regional objects — are supported by the commission, guarantees will be provided. But I want to say that, of course, banks need to work, bearing in mind that when providing guarantees, bank loans are reduced at best by a percentage.
Percentage is not so much. Therefore, of course, banks also need to take measures in this regard to make these measures more effective, because there really is everything, in fact, there is provision at the expense of the state, so banks have fewer risks and less margin ...
VLADIMIR PUTIN: What, in principle, is the private banking sector oriented towards the behavior of Sberbank, VTB, VEB, Gazprombank? Everywhere there is a powerful state participation: either governmental, or ours, in fact, state-owned companies, or the Central Bank. I think that we could have worked more closely with this community.
Indeed, when our banks provide the regions of the Russian Federation with loans at the same interest rate as ordinary ordinary participants in economic activity, this is probably not very fair. And we have talked about this many times, there is only little movement in this direction. I ask you to return to this.
A.ARTAMONOV: Vladimir Vladimirovich, excuse me, maybe this will not be completely like, but nevertheless today certain decisions have been made, for example, in the United States of America on the development of manufacturing industries of small and medium-sized businesses and state support. Maybe it makes sense to see if something will be useful to us there?
Thanks.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: There is no point, and it will not be useful, because we have a different economy and a different currency.
A.ARTAMONOV: I agree.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: If we simply “swing” money thoughtlessly and it is not clear where, then this can only end with a transfer from rubles to dollars or euros and a withdrawal from our economy. It is not as simple as it seems at first glance.
A.ARTAMONOV: Of course, I agree.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Thank you.
Tatyana Alekseevna Golikova, please.
T. GOLIKOVA: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich! Dear participants of the meeting!
Given the discussion, I would like to dwell on 12 problematic issues arising from the implementation of the decrees of the President discussed today, based on the control measures carried out by the Accounts Chamber in 2012 and the past period of 2013.
The first topic is education. But the problem that I would like to say is not only about education, but also about the increase in wages in social sectors as a whole, arising from the decrees of the President. I would like to note the following, when analyzing the levels of wages and the trends that are developing to increase them, it is necessary to fix the heterogeneity of the situation that is developing in the regions of the Russian Federation.
Analyzing the situation for today's meeting, we came to the following conclusion. It seems to us that, nevertheless, it is necessary to carry out work on a clear reconciliation of estimates of the funds that are needed to increase the level of wages in the triangle: the Ministry of Finance - a subject of the Russian Federation - the corresponding branch ministry, which monitors the increase in wages in the corresponding region and, as a rule , is based on estimates of the increase in the level of wages, which are presented by the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, in contrast to the Ministry of Finance, which, by forming and allocating funds for the SBA the budget balance of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is based on the norms of Presidential decrees, which relate to the following.
The increase in the level of wages should be based not only on a simple, direct increase in wages, but also on 30 percent savings in connection with the need to restructure the respective sectors. As a result of this, we have inconsistencies in assessing the increase in the level of wages between the subject, the branch ministry and the Ministry of Finance.
This very clearly emerges when the issue of allocating funds for balance is discussed when passing the budget in the State Duma and then during budget execution during the corresponding financial year. And it seems to us that such reconciliation work should be carried out already in the first quarter of 2014, otherwise we will return to this topic all the time in the context of balanced budgets and the inability to fulfill the specified indicators.
The second topic - on education, which I would like to draw attention to is that 80 percent of the total budget of the state program "Education Development" is made up of the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. But mechanisms to influence the allocation of the necessary amount of funds by the regions and the implementation of the tasks set by the decree have not been created. And it seems to us that now, as part of the work to clarify state programs, by February 1, 2014, the Ministry of Education should pay appropriate attention to this.
The third. The most problematic situation is the implementation of the provisions of the Decree on the achievement by 2016 of 100% accessibility of preschool education for children aged three to seven years. In the whole country, over 5.5 million children aged three to seven years receive pre-school education in various forms, which makes 84.3 percent of the total number of this age category. At the same time, as of November 1, 2013, more than 449 thousand children were in line. The most acute problem of ensuring the availability of preschool education for children aged three to seven years remains in 17 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The highest indicator in the Republic of Tuva is 28.8 percent.
Considering that at the beginning of 2013, 2.4 million children needed to be placed in preschool educational institutions, and the number of new places planned for creation in 2013 satisfies this need by 15 percent, there is a risk that by 2016 there will be no 100% access to preschool education for children aged three to seven years.
The increase in the number of children aged three to seven years to provide them with places in preschool institutions will amount to 1.2 million people as of January 1, 2016. At the same time, it is proposed to solve this problem due to the capabilities of the non-governmental sector of preschool education and the development of varied forms of preschool education, which is currently very poorly developed in the regions of the Russian Federation.
For example, only 12.2 thousand children receive education in family groups or from individual entrepreneurs, which is only 0.2 percent of the total number of children enrolled in preschool education. It seems to me that additional efforts are required to solve this problem and the development of additional mechanisms for its solution.
The most problematic, from our point of view, is the implementation of the so-called "housing decree" No. 600. I will focus on six points that arise from the control and verification activities of the Accounts Chamber. Moreover, they are based on data for 2012, as I said, and the past period of 2013.
The first one. According to the results of expert and analytical measures and control measures, the following was established. Out of ten values \u200b\u200bof target indicators and indicators established for 2012, the Federal Target Program “Housing”, which is an integral part of the state program for providing affordable and comfortable housing and communal services to citizens of the Russian Federation, six values \u200b\u200bare not determined due to the lack of data from Rosstat, three are planned values not reached. The federal budget funds for the implementation of the FTP "Housing" are used inefficiently.
As of January 1, 2013, the unused balance of the federal budget on the accounts of the budgets of the constituent entities of the Federation amounted to 13.4 billion rubles, or almost a quarter of the stipulated annual amount. This situation is associated with the extremely low organization of preparatory work in the regions. Prior to the approved program, work on the development of urban planning documentation, registration of property and land relations was not carried out, there was no priority development of project documentation, as well as medium-term planning of the consolidated budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation for a period of three years.
The second one. As part of the program for the modernization of communal infrastructure, for example, in the Stavropol Territory, federal budget funds in the amount of 69.5 million rubles have not been used for more than a year. The reason is that preliminary processing of applications for co-financing is not carried out in the system mode, as a result of which, instead of the 11 objects planned for commissioning in 2012, only two were actually introduced.
So, in the territory of Primorsky Krai 1353 land plots were provided for housing construction, while they are provided with infrastructure at a low level. Power lines - 25 percent of the plots, transport infrastructure - 60, a water supply system - less than 15 percent of the plots.
The third. In the framework of the subprogram "Stimulating housing development programs of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation" 12 out of 26 entities did not provide funding for the activities of the subprogram in the amount of 980.4 million rubles. For more than a year, federal budget funds in the amount of 274.8 million rubles were not used in 13 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, while only 11 of the planned 29 capital construction projects of the social and transport infrastructure were commissioned.
An analysis of the current situation shows that the main reason for the failure to implement the measures for this subprogram was the lack of proper preparation of applications for co-financing, their formal consideration without taking into account the actual state of affairs in the regions, without checking the real readiness for the implementation of projects.
As a result, agreements with the Ministry of Regional Development were concluded with a significant violation of the deadlines. Accordingly, there was a late transfer of funds from the federal budget to the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and their hanging on accounts. And this made it impossible to conduct tendering procedures, since tendering requires a sufficiently long period.
Fourth. The completion of measures for regulatory support of the industry was not ensured in order to solve the problems of demonopolizing it, eliminating excessive administrative barriers, simplifying the procedures for providing land plots and increasing the volume of off-budget investments in the development of engineering infrastructure. Such work should be carried out as soon as possible. Otherwise, we will have the same flaws that we had in previous years.
Fifth. Control measures for the analysis and implementation of programs for relocating people from dilapidated and dilapidated housing in the Oryol Oblast, the Republic of Buryatia show that capital repairs and construction practically do not use modern energy-efficient environmentally friendly materials and technologies, as well as modern technologies for the production of building materials, which can reduce the cost of construction . This situation is primarily due to the lack of proper technical regulation of the industry, obsolete building codes and regulations, and the non-binding use of modern green standards and technologies.
In addition, the Town Planning Code states that the requirements of technical regulations are mandatory. Currently, only one technical regulation on the safety of buildings and structures is approved.
In this regard, we consider it appropriate to ensure amendments to the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation and certain legislative acts aimed at ensuring the mandatory requirements of building codes and rules; systems of price regulation in addition to the requirements of technical regulations in the implementation of construction activities, as well as increased responsibility for their violation; development and approval in the prescribed manner of technical regulations for energy efficiency, environmental friendliness of buildings and structures in the Russian Federation; the creation and functioning of a unified system of price regulation of the construction industry, taking into account the territorial features of pricing and the possibility of its constant updating, as well as develop mechanisms for attracting investments to ensure financing of advanced engineering preparation of territories for the organization of housing construction.
And finally, the sixth. The control measures carried out by the Accounts Chamber on the analysis of the implementation of resettlement programs from dilapidated and emergency housing in various entities show that in the regions there is no reliable information on the actual volume of emergency housing, as well as on the actual state of engineering systems. The constituent entities of the Russian Federation, together with the Housing and Utilities Reform Support Fund, have not yet formed objective programs for the complete elimination of the dilapidated and emergency housing stock until September 1, 2017.
Once again I want to draw your attention to the numbers that have already sounded today. The forecast plan for the elimination of emergency housing, developed by the Housing and Utilities Reform Support Fund and including 10.7 million square meters, does not correspond to the official statistical reporting in form No. 22-Housing and Utilities, where this figure is at least 13.4 million square meters. The forecast plan also does not take into account the volume of undistributed housing in the BAM zone, despite the fact that the approved program is actually only 32 percent complete.
Moreover, the applications that are formed by the regions as of October 1, 2013 include about 9.5 thousand emergency houses, which is less than 20 percent of the emergency housing stock. And this is obvious. Regions underestimate indicators based on budgetary opportunities. With this approach, the completion of this program on time by September 1, 2017 seems problematic. In our opinion, the limited duration of the program for the relocation of citizens from emergency housing requires the immediate completion of measures for its inventory in all municipalities and the development of work to eliminate it.
In addition - now this topic has sounded - it seems advisable to study the issue of changing the mechanism of co-financing of programs on this topic. And to do this not depending on budgetary provision, but, perhaps, individually, according to clear criteria. And for each region to determine the ratio of attracted funds of the regional budget and the funds of the Fund for Assistance to the Reform of Housing and Utilities by increasing the share of co-financing from the federal budget for those regions where it is objectively necessary, through subsidies, possibly even to balance regional budgets.
I’m talking about this because each of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation received a different inheritance, and given the volume of this topic both in terms of physical volumes and in terms of costs that should be directed to, I think that it is advisable.
And finally, about labor productivity. Literally three points. In accordance with the decree on long-term state economic policy, by 2018 the labor productivity indicator should increase one and a half times relative to the 2011 level. The basis for this is investment growth, technological renewal of the industry, development of competition, support for the development of science and technology, advanced training of employed citizens and so on.
The dynamics of labor productivity by GDP characterizes the situation in the economy as a whole. In the context of industry, the picture is incomplete. In the basic sector of sectors, the dynamics of labor productivity is calculated as the dynamics of value added or output divided by the dynamics of labor costs. These industries belong to the group of industries that sell products mainly at market prices.
At the same time, the indicator of labor productivity dynamics is not calculated for sectors of the public sector, such as medicine, education, government, utilities. In addition, given the informational limitations, the dynamics of labor productivity is not calculated for the type of activity “financial activity”.
In the types of economic activities for which Rosstat does not calculate labor productivity: state administration, education, healthcare, financial activities, and the provision of other services, in 2012 the added value amounted to 10.4 trillion rubles, or 16.6 percent of GDP. 17.8 million people were employed, or 26.2 percent of the total employed population. All this testifies to the fact that we are coming to the necessity of changing the methodology for calculating labor productivity, which the Minister of Economics has already spoken about.
The second one. A few words about labor productivity indicators in government programs. The analysis shows that the indicator “growth in labor productivity” is not included in the list of target indicators and indicators of individual state programs. This refers to the state program for the development of agriculture and regulation of the market for agricultural products, raw materials and food for 2013-2020, and space activities in Russia.
The state program for the development of industry and increasing its competitiveness provides for an increase in labor productivity in industry by 1.42 times by 2018, which is below the target. Although this program, logically, should have been integral in terms of achieving an indicator of labor productivity.
At the same time, according to the state program for the development of electronic and electronic industries, by 2018 it is planned to increase labor productivity by 2.5 times. According to the state program for the development of the aviation industry, by 2015 - 2.2 times. In the pharmaceutical and medical industries, by 2018 - 3.43 times, and so on.
In this regard, it seems to us that when adjusting the programs by February 1, it is necessary to take into account all these inconsistencies and still choose some program that would contain an integrated indicator to increase labor productivity and that could testify to the measures taken in relevant industries.
And finally, the third. Recently, significant funds have been allocated from the federal budget for the modernization of various sectors of the economy. In most cases, investments are made in the form of a contribution to the authorized capital of open joint stock companies. In this case, no one makes an assessment of the impact of investments on labor productivity growth. Audits of the Accounts Chamber show that often the investments received, especially in the early years, are not used to modernize production and high-performance jobs, but are used for other purposes, including current expenses and for placement on deposit accounts.
It seems appropriate to change approaches to the procedure for allocating budget funds for investments. And one of the main conditions for allocating funds should be programs to increase labor productivity in the respective joint-stock companies.
Thanks.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Just a second, Tatyana Alekseevna. You said that 25 percent of the annual federal budget allocations are not used for housing.
T. GOLIKOVA: This was the “Housing” program as of January 1, 2013. But we think that we will not get serious positive changes. It’s too early to talk about January 1, 2014, the report will be only in February most likely.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: As for subsidizing sectors of the economy, we have discussed this repeatedly at recent meetings, I simply remind the participants of these meetings of the proposals and agreements that have been formulated.
Thank you, Tatyana Alekseevna.
Dear colleagues, who would like to speak?
You are welcome.
V. Zhirinovsky: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, very briefly on the topic. As for raising labor productivity. Maybe, after all, we all work on December 31 to 18 hours and get to work on January 2, and everyone could take an additional vacation individually for two weeks?
The second side is the use of equipment. We have purchased a lot, albeit still imported, but very efficient equipment, sometimes even more than, say, in London or in some other European city. But used in one shift. Maybe switch to double-shift use of equipment? Because it stands, it is expensive, it is needed. But where citizens are especially concerned, they get in line, because it works in one shift.
Of Education. We switched to bachelors and masters instead of specialists. Graduate studies are mostly paid. Maybe not everyone calculated well how the bachelors who study for only four years will affect the development of industry, agriculture, and the financial sector?
Maybe it could have been done like this: leaving a specialist bachelor — five years of study, and a master’s — one or two years of study. Paid magistracy, after that it’s hard for someone to get involved in a paid graduate school. Maybe in the future to see something to adjust, if experts decide so, I'm just saying.
The state monopoly in the housing sector is turning into a private monopoly. There are no competitors in the supply of electricity, gas, water, heat. Private huckster sucked, imposed tribute to the entire population of the country. For example, Russian Utility Systems OJSC, the profit is very good, and the company belongs to two firms in Cyprus. And in general, after all, no budget is enough for subsidies to the housing and communal services.
Everything will not be repaired in a timely manner if there is no real competition between state and private companies. Moscow has already taken this path. Therefore, with clear management and control, with the normal motivation of managers and housing and communal services workers, regional leaders are able to protect the population from communal hucksters and accidents.
For labor productivity to grow, people need to work on modern equipment, but it is expensive, and affordable loans are needed to purchase it. So far, loans of 15-20 percent per annum are higher than profitability in the manufacturing industry, and labor growth will be weak.
Our mechanical engineering is still weak with us. On a fast-growing scale, we import imported equipment, machinery, and appliances. And how to repair? Spare parts should be updated in five to seven years. A technological trap must be avoided. Friends-partners often in our history became enemies. How they are tearing Ukraine now, shows their true face. These are breathtaking double standards.
What is going on in Ukraine? They advise both the police and the army in no case to use force - flowers, lanterns, pies. And the other day, Hamburg police used the entire arsenal of means of the entire German police and dispersed by force the demonstrators, tens of thousands in Hamburg, hundreds of wounded and arrested. And everyone is silent! No sanctions! What are the sanctions? All is well. It turns out that Ukraine is of the second grade. The Slavs must be silent, even if they seize state power, but in no case should force be used.
And the last one. We see German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle walking along the Maidan. And the question is, where is our Foreign Minister Sergei Viktorovich Lavrov? Maybe it’s time to leave the offices and go there, to the same Maidan, and defend the national interests of our country there? I would sometimes suggest that ministers go to field work.
I just wanted to report on this topic.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Thank you very much. Please sit down.
As for the Minister of Foreign Affairs, he is an intelligent person. We do not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries: neither the Federal Republic of Germany, nor Ukraine.
And if we talk about the current topic, I can not disagree with Vladimir Volfovich on the fact that the state monopoly in the housing sector in our country is gradually turning into a private monopoly. We have already spoken about this several times. This is a very alarming signal, very alarming, I draw attention to this.
You are welcome.
G. ZYUGANOV: Dear colleagues!
Recently, the President has formulated, in fact, a new course in both foreign and domestic politics. In foreign policy, it is already yielding quite effective results. Strengthening our positions in the Asia-Pacific region will allow us to more effectively solve the social problems of Siberia and the Far East. Our principled position on Syria and Iran improves the investment climate and turns even more recent opponents in our direction.
As for the situation in Ukraine, which is dear to all of us, a fundamental decision has been made that will allow us to strengthen not only friendly relations, but also to restore many torn economic relations.
I believe that a number of steps have been taken in domestic politics, which are encouraging when looking at the new year.
Vladimir Vladimirovich, your May decrees have largely changed the social climate. But the whole problem is how to execute them. Golikova's report indicates that there are many problems.
Your Message and speech on Valdai compel us to rely on the thickness of the entire thousand-year history of our traditions and culture, which is fundamentally important in a multinational country against the background of aggravated national relations.
As for today's State Council, it seems to me that it will give an impetus to a more effective solution to the problems that you formulated in your last Address, especially those related to labor productivity and deoffshorization of the economy. In general, the priorities are formulated, a decision is made on strategic planning, which allows you to coordinate the efforts of both lawmakers and implementers.
A law on industrial policy has been prepared on the problems of modernization, it should be adopted, we have discussed it thoroughly, including everything related to the aerospace industry, and here you can make a serious breakthrough.
The task of creating 25 million modern jobs is a very fundamental and difficult task, and it should be in the spotlight. In general, in order to realize these tasks, it is really necessary to raise labor productivity, but a whole series of problems arise, which we must honestly and frankly speak about at the State Council today.
To implement the problem associated with high technology, with our security, you must have at least 20 trillion rubles. This task is set. To comply with the May decrees, a minimum of 5-6 trillion is needed, but in order to complete this program as a whole, GDP growth must be at least 5 percent. If you look at the forecast of our economists three years ago, they said that this year there will be about 8 percent of GDP growth, we have slipped to less than one and a half, and there are no special prospects next year.
If you look at how the world economies work today: China - 7.5 will give this year, the United States - 2.4. In general, the average economic growth in the world will be 3 percent, in the next 4 percent are forecasted approximately.
That is, in order to implement the new course, in general, a new policy is needed in the financial and economic field. And here we have a lot of problems. Gigantic funds are needed for this. Once again I repeat, we cannot postpone the problem of solving the housing and communal services, and your concern today is obvious. It must be remembered that the 600 billion that the Minister spoke of is extremely small to solve this problem. This figure will increase several times, if solved comprehensively in the next ten years.
We cannot push energy into the background. We have entire areas where over the years no wires and no poles have been changed.
As for education, health care and science, in the budget that has already been adopted, these sectors have declined by 300 billion rubles. And despite the attempts and very interesting proposals in the field of health care, including education, nevertheless, if you take and look at the volume of GDP of these two leading areas, then they will not grow but decrease in the next three years.
And before us, Vladimir Vladimirovich, two dilemmas arise: either measures of a tough economy, they are demonstrated in Europe by the example of Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain (in Spain every second young person is unemployed), or a new economic course, which many countries adhere to, including Obama largely copies the Roosevelt course.
As for China, they have found a reasonable solution. You have studied these problems and know them well, but they suggest shifting to regions. There is nothing to shift. They are in debt, 1.8 trillion are the debts of the regions, and two-thirds are already on credit. This means the economic course requires serious adjustments.
As for citizens, look, their debts to bankers amounted to almost 10 trillion rubles. We don’t take much here.
But there are resources in the country. I want to remind you that this year we will sell raw materials again by almost 16 trillion rubles. About six fall into the treasury. 10 trillion - the tribute we pay to our oligarchy, and to foreign patrons - about a billion dollars.
You set the task of deoffshorization. Very correct, but it will be necessary to show everyone character and will. Otherwise, they will continue to be pulled away.
We have 7.5 trillion frozen. They can be put into circulation. Now the situation has demanded with Ukraine - a strong-willed, timely and very correct decision has been made. But here, if you look at the budget, how to increase productivity, when mechanical engineering, electronics, instrumentation, robotics are almost "bare", nothing stands out there? Where does this performance come from?
This also applies to taxes. How much will we tolerate that the oligarch pays 9 percent on income — less than the poor doctor and teacher?
By the way, Vladimir Vladimirovich, yesterday Khodorkovsky held a press conference in Germany. He said at the end rather curious words, I want everyone to listen: "I am still confident that private business is more effective than the state." But, excuse me, a business that does not feel social responsibility has no right to exist at all. Khodorkovsky had 10 years to get to this idea. And we have a lot of businessmen who do not experience any social responsibility either to the collective, or to single-industry towns, or to the republics.
And the last one. Next year marks 85 years of industrialization. I left a note for you how our half-dead country, which did not fly, did not go, in general, in 1929, by 1941 came out with the best equipment, having built 6 thousand of the best enterprises. Moreover, they were built by those who, in fact, opposed the Soviet government every day. And we have 70 years of the Great Victory ahead. We could join forces and prepare for these anniversary dates more technologically equipped, having solved many internal problems.
In conclusion, I want to wish everyone a Happy New Year.
Thanks.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Thank you very much.
I would just like to fix some things.
Of course, BRICS countries remain the drivers of development, but there are certain problems. And the questions are not in absolute terms, the questions are that the previously projected growth rates are less than I would like to see them. And I would like to see not only the BRICS countries, including the People’s Republic of China, India, us and Brazil, I would like to see it differently for the entire global economy, bearing in mind that they, like a locomotive, pulled out this entire economy.
The situation has changed, and forecasts have also changed: what was planned earlier, unfortunately, will not be achieved. In countries with developed market economies, the situation has changed, it has changed a little for the better, it has become a little better, but not the way we would like. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has significantly underestimated the growth of the global economy. I can be mistaken in some little things, but somewhere, in my opinion, from 3.5 percent to one and a half. In my opinion, according to the results of the whole year, there will be less, it seems to me that somewhere there will be 1.4, not more.
Therefore, a significant decline throughout the global economy. In some countries of the Eurozone, a recession still persists, that is, there will be a minus in general. On the whole, in the Eurozone, there will not be more than a percent at all, somewhere, probably, 0.5-0.6 maximum. We’ll look at the results of the year, but these are some indicators.
Against this background, Russia is not much different from the global economy. The same absolutely tendencies, even better than in many European countries, somewhere, as we said, maybe 1.4-1.5. We’ll also look at the results of the year. But this, of course, does not mean that we should only refer to it and calmly look at it, here I absolutely agree with you.
Moreover, and in the Message he spoke about this, we must keep in mind the internal problems and the need to overcome them. Some of them sounded here, and the governors said - this is the availability of loans, this is the development of infrastructure and this is the improvement of the business climate.
As for our reserves, of course, we can use them, and we also talked about this, but we must do this very carefully, bearing in mind that this is our “airbag”, which we must cherish. The decision has already been made to develop precisely the infrastructure, and not just the infrastructure in general, but precisely those infrastructure projects that will give visible, understandable, secured returns. Such projects have been selected, and they will be implemented.
Please, Mikhail Viktorovich.
M. SHMAKOV: Permit me a short remark?
VLADIMIR PUTIN: I ask you.
M. SHMAKOV: I will not talk about Ukraine and not about China, I want to say about labor productivity.
Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, in the reports to date there is no universally recognized or generally approved Russian methodology of labor productivity, and in many ways these things are countable. And depending on what you put into the parameters, which approaches are used, different numbers are obtained.
Therefore, in the report that we have, and in the materials there are, for example, calculations of sectoral labor productivity of the automotive industry, aviation, which are compared with foreign counterparts. But these enterprises or these firms are not analogues, since there is a different production structure and enterprise structure.
In the same way as on the 63rd page there is a table - data on labor productivity and labor costs by country. And here Russia is a fairly low rate. But in fact, they are even lower, because if you recalculate the wage rate - hourly, it turns out that the average wage in the economy as a whole should be 50 thousand rubles per month.
In fact, we have official statistics - about 30 thousand rubles per month, and the median salary is only 20 thousand rubles per month. Therefore, here the indicators are even lower. If we recalculate labor productivity on wages, then it will be 3-3.5 times higher than other developed countries with higher labor productivity.
Of course, it was correctly stated both in the report and in the speeches that labor productivity depends primarily on technology and the organization of production. It is clear that it is necessary to change technology, to buy high-performance equipment. Nevertheless, incorrect conclusions and incorrect tables appear.
Therefore, I think that it would be worthwhile to give some suggestion or decision to create a generally recognized national methodology for calculating labor productivity in a fairly short time so that everyone speaks the same language. And then everyone pulls out only that argument, which in this case illustrates exactly the idea that he is trying to present.
Thanks.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Dear colleagues, we will finish. This is what I would like to say in conclusion.
There are a lot of us in this room. But this is natural, because it is the final, final meeting, discussion of the results of the year, summing up, analysis of what has been done in the most important areas of our work.
But, despite the fact that we are many in the hall, for the country it is almost nothing, a few people, if we keep in mind that we have almost 145 million people, 143. But very much very much depends on these people who are here now in the life of our state and in the life of our people.
We discussed with you the most important areas of work. I want to say again: I would really like it to not be some kind of on-duty meeting - we talked, nodded, thought and parted.
First, I ask both the Government apparatus and the Administration apparatus to jointly prepare the final document of our meeting today.
And the second one. Over the next year, we will return to certain aspects, but I would like to draw special attention to one - this is the housing program. And I ask, after today's proposals are formulated, ways to solve the problems that we are facing, which we have formulated, are set to meet again in May in this or a slightly narrower composition, to talk about what has been done to fulfill our today's proposals .
In May there will be the first meeting on this issue, in November - the next. It will be 2014. If I see that in some places what is happening today is recorded as: 25 percent of the federal funds allocated for the housing program have not been implemented ... What is it? Does this mean how we work? And quite often we hear a conversation that there is not enough money, there is not enough, there is not enough.
These funds will go back to the federal budget, will not be implemented, will be redistributed further, and the program will remain where it was. Meanwhile, this is one of the most acute problems of our country. So we will see what and how is done in May, and then the second time we will return to this position in November next year.
And I want to tell you, as it is said in such cases, there is nothing personal. You see, almost nothing has been done in Stavropol. It is clear that a new man came to the place of governor, and he still had problems with his health, he did not work a significant amount of time. But in other places, what? In other regions, how?
Without any fuss, we will see what was done in May, and then calmly return to this in November and analyze who worked individually and how.
And once again I want to say: nothing personal! I just need the work to be performed, the tasks that are set and formulated. This also applies to federal authorities, this also applies to regional ones. And at the end of November we will make certain decisions, including administrative ones, where necessary. I ask you to just keep this in mind.
Thanks. All the best!
Learning environment: new projects A typical project of a school with 825 seats
A catalog of typical projects of social infrastructure buildings has been created in the Moscow region
A catalog of typical projects of social infrastructure buildings has been created in the Moscow region
Turnkey Cottage Construction Roadmap
The report of the head of the Ministry of Construction of Russia Mikhail I at a meeting of the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation on monitoring the achievement of targets of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation